FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL820
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also referred to as FinePix F305EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also referred to as IT100
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL820 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the FujiFilm F300EXR versus Samsung SL820, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the F300EXR (12MP) and the SL820 (12MP) is relatively similar but the F300EXR (1/2") and SL820 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe F300EXR was introduced 18 months after the SL820 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the F300EXR grades versus the SL820 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR & Samsung SL820. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery & Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Samsung SL820
| F300EXR | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 18 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the FujiFilm F300EXR
| SL820 | F300EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Samsung SL820
| F300EXR | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm F300EXR provides exterior measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Samsung SL820 has measurements of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm F300EXR versus Samsung SL820 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the F300EXR compared to the SL820.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the F300EXR and SL820 is 91 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over technical specs. The image below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the F300EXR and SL820.
As you have seen, both cameras have the same megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The F300EXR has the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult. The younger F300EXR should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Samsung SL820 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Samsung SL820 |
| Also called | FinePix F305EXR | IT100 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-07-21 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215 gr (0.47 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $280 | $280 |