FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB2200F
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34


59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Released July 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix F305EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Revealed January 2014

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the F300EXR (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) and the F300EXR (1/2") and WB2200F (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.

The F300EXR was introduced 4 years prior to the WB2200F which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm F300EXR being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the F300EXR matches up against the WB2200F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR and Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Samsung WB2200F
F300EXR | WB2200F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the FujiFilm F300EXR
WB2200F | F300EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | July 2010 | More modern by 42 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Samsung WB2200F
F300EXR | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The FujiFilm F300EXR comes with physical measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has specifications of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") and a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB2200F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the F300EXR against the WB2200F.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the F300EXR and WB2200F is 91 and 59 respectively.

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by researching a spec sheet. The picture below will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the F300EXR and WB2200F.
As you can see, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The F300EXR with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB2200F will render extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged F300EXR will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Samsung WB2200F |
Alternative name | FinePix F305EXR | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-07-21 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 1/8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 215 grams (0.47 pounds) | 708 grams (1.56 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-50 | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $280 | $599 |