FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB35F
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced July 2010
- Additionally Known as FinePix F305EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the FujiFilm F300EXR versus Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the F300EXR (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the F300EXR (1/2") and WB35F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe F300EXR was launched 4 years prior to the WB35F which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the F300EXR grades against the WB35F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR and Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are provided at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Samsung WB35F
| F300EXR | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the FujiFilm F300EXR
| WB35F | F300EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 42 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Samsung WB35F
| F300EXR | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm F300EXR has got exterior dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm F300EXR versus Samsung WB35F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the F300EXR against the WB35F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the F300EXR and WB35F is 91 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specs. The picture here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the F300EXR and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The F300EXR because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB35F will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged F300EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Samsung WB35F |
| Also Known as | FinePix F305EXR | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-07-21 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 215g (0.47 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $280 | $130 |