FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000
93 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94d98/94d98cc52c7bd580a95b72f2a42a816cab8471e7" alt="FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR front FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 205g - 99 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is FinePix F75EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the FujiFilm F70EXR versus Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the F70EXR (10MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty close but the F70EXR (1/2") and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The F70EXR was released 5 months prior to the Tough-3000 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the F70EXR matches up against the Tough-3000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are viewable at FujiFilm F70EXR Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F70EXR over the Olympus Tough-3000
F70EXR | Tough-3000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the FujiFilm F70EXR
Tough-3000 | F70EXR |
---|
Common features in the FujiFilm F70EXR and Olympus Tough-3000
F70EXR | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2010 | Same age |
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm F70EXR enjoys outer measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm F70EXR versus Olympus Tough-3000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the F70EXR vs the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ed/042ed8c31af7cfe8ef96ee5315728b441cd1fa91" alt="FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the F70EXR and Tough-3000 is 93 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32837/328370cc8000e78292ec1dd26624b95d072d6366" alt="FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching a spec sheet. The photograph here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the F70EXR and Tough-3000.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The F70EXR due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus Tough-3000 will render more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3c14/a3c1476f6b62714f1faa5e3f9f91961917dedd59" alt="FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9513d/9513dc862244756c0e20fd16a03a8a183d68e425" alt="FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Otherwise known as | FinePix F75EXR | mju Tough 3000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3616 x 2712 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-270mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.20 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 159 gr (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $280 | $0 |