FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB800F
93 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 205g - 99 x 59 x 23mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also Known as FinePix F75EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the F70EXR (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the F70EXR (1/2") and WB800F (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe F70EXR was unveiled 4 years before the WB800F and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the F70EXR grades vs the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR & Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm F70EXR Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F70EXR over the Samsung WB800F
| F70EXR | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the FujiFilm F70EXR
| WB800F | F70EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 42 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm F70EXR and Samsung WB800F
| F70EXR | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm F70EXR features outer dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the F70EXR compared to the WB800F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the F70EXR and WB800F is 93 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specs. The visual below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the F70EXR and WB800F.
All in all, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The F70EXR with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB800F will give greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older F70EXR is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm F70EXR vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F70EXR | Samsung WB800F |
| Also Known as | FinePix F75EXR | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3616 x 2712 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-270mm (10.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $280 | $300 |