FujiFilm F80EXR vs Kodak Z915
92 Imaging
35 Features
28 Overall
32
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 210g - 99 x 59 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Other Name is FinePix F85EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm F80EXR vs Kodak Z915 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the FujiFilm F80EXR versus Kodak Z915, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the F80EXR (12MP) and the Z915 (10MP) is very close but the F80EXR (1/2") and Z915 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe F80EXR was unveiled 18 months later than the Z915 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the F80EXR scores versus the Z915 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm F80EXR vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR and Kodak EasyShare Z915. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm F80EXR Gallery and Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F80EXR over the Kodak Z915
| F80EXR | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 18 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the FujiFilm F80EXR
| Z915 | F80EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm F80EXR and Kodak Z915
| F80EXR | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm F80EXR comes with outer dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z915 has proportions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the FujiFilm F80EXR versus Kodak Z915 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the F80EXR and the Z915.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the F80EXR and Z915 is 92 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the F80EXR and Z915.
As you can see, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The F80EXR having a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the FujiFilm F80EXR will provide you with extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent F80EXR is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Alternate name | FinePix F85EXR | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-270mm (10.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1250s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 210g (0.46 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $400 | $200 |