FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
28 Overall
32
92 Imaging
35 Features
28 Overall
32
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
FujiFilm F80EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 210g - 99 x 59 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also referred to as FinePix F85EXR
Olympus TG-630 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the F80EXR (12MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is very close but the F80EXR (1/2") and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe F80EXR was unveiled 3 years prior to the TG-630 iHS and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the F80EXR matches up against the TG-630 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm F80EXR Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F80EXR over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| F80EXR | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the FujiFilm F80EXR
| TG-630 iHS | F80EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 31 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm F80EXR and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| F80EXR | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The FujiFilm F80EXR offers outer measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has sizing of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the F80EXR versus the TG-630 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the F80EXR and TG-630 iHS is 92 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by looking through specs. The visual underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the F80EXR and TG-630 iHS.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer the same exact resolution but different sensor sizing. The F80EXR comes with the larger sensor which should make getting shallower depth of field simpler. The older F80EXR will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm F80EXR Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-630 iHS Portrait photography information
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2")
no RAW support
offers face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
FujiFilm F80EXR as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-630 iHS as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2")
no RAW support
heavier than competition (210 grams)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sports photography with FujiFilm F80EXR
Sports photography with Olympus TG-630 iHS
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2")
no phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
environment sealing
low fps (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (220 per charge)
lacks phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
FujiFilm F80EXR as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-630 iHS as a Travel photography camera
built-in flash
really wide (27mm)
great zoom (270mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (210g)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
environment sealing
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
terrible battery (220 per charge)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with FujiFilm F80EXR
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-630 iHS
really wide (27mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2")
no RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
fairly wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
terrible battery (220 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm F80EXR as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-630 iHS as a Vlogging camera
really wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic support
heavier than competition (210g)
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Also called as | FinePix F85EXR | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-270mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 210g (0.46 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $200 |