FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-3
92 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 210g - 99 x 59 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Other Name is FinePix F85EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the FujiFilm F80EXR versus Olympus TG-3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the F80EXR (12MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the F80EXR (1/2") and TG-3 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe F80EXR was manufactured 4 years before the TG-3 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the F80EXR scores versus the TG-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR and Olympus Tough TG-3. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm F80EXR Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F80EXR over the Olympus TG-3
| F80EXR | TG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the FujiFilm F80EXR
| TG-3 | F80EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2014 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 46 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm F80EXR and Olympus TG-3
| F80EXR | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm F80EXR enjoys exterior measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm F80EXR versus Olympus TG-3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the F80EXR versus the TG-3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the F80EXR and TG-3 is 92 and 90 respectively.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The photograph below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the F80EXR and TG-3.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The F80EXR because of its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus TG-3 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older F80EXR is going to be behind in sensor technology.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Alternate name | FinePix F85EXR | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-270mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 210 gr (0.46 pounds) | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $400 | $350 |
