FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
92 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 210g - 99 x 59 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Other Name is FinePix F85EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Photography Glossary FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the FujiFilm F80EXR and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the F80EXR (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty close but the F80EXR (1/2") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe F80EXR was unveiled 3 years before the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the F80EXR scores versus the XZ-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm F80EXR Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F80EXR over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| F80EXR | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the FujiFilm F80EXR
| XZ-2 iHS | F80EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 30 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm F80EXR and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| F80EXR | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and size. The FujiFilm F80EXR enjoys exterior measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm F80EXR and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the F80EXR versus the XZ-2 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the F80EXR and XZ-2 iHS is 92 and 85 respectively.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing purely by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the F80EXR and XZ-2 iHS.
Plainly, both cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The F80EXR comes with the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult. The older F80EXR will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix F85EXR | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-270mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 210 gr (0.46 lbs) | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $400 | $450 |
