FujiFilm F80EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1
92 Imaging
35 Features
28 Overall
32
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 210g - 99 x 59 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix F85EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm F80EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Lets look closer at the FujiFilm F80EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the F80EXR (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the F80EXR (1/2") and WG-M1 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe F80EXR was manufactured 5 years before the WG-M1 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the F80EXR scores vs the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm F80EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm F80EXR Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F80EXR over the Ricoh WG-M1
| F80EXR | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the FujiFilm F80EXR
| WG-M1 | F80EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 | June 2010 | Newer by 51 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm F80EXR and Ricoh WG-M1
| F80EXR | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm F80EXR features external dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm F80EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the F80EXR against the WG-M1.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the F80EXR and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The pic here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the F80EXR and WG-M1.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The F80EXR because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-M1 will give you more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged F80EXR is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix F85EXR | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-06-16 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-270mm (10.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 210 gr (0.46 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $400 | $2,000 |