FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB250F
92 Imaging
35 Features
28 Overall
32
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 210g - 99 x 59 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also referred to as FinePix F85EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB250F Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the FujiFilm F80EXR and Samsung WB250F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the F80EXR (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very comparable but the F80EXR (1/2") and WB250F (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe F80EXR was introduced 3 years earlier than the WB250F which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the F80EXR grades versus the WB250F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR & Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm F80EXR Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F80EXR over the Samsung WB250F
| F80EXR | WB250F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the FujiFilm F80EXR
| WB250F | F80EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 31 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm F80EXR and Samsung WB250F
| F80EXR | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm F80EXR comes with physical measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm F80EXR and Samsung WB250F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the F80EXR vs the WB250F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the F80EXR and WB250F is 92 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by going through specs. The pic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the F80EXR and WB250F.
All in all, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The F80EXR using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung WB250F will produce extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged F80EXR will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Samsung WB250F |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix F85EXR | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-270mm (10.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 210 grams (0.46 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $400 | $250 |