FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB35F
92 Imaging
35 Features
28 Overall
32
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 210g - 99 x 59 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix F85EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to look more closely at the FujiFilm F80EXR and Samsung WB35F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the F80EXR (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the F80EXR (1/2") and WB35F (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe F80EXR was revealed 4 years before the WB35F and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the F80EXR scores vs the WB35F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm F80EXR Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F80EXR over the Samsung WB35F
| F80EXR | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the FujiFilm F80EXR
| WB35F | F80EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus |
Common features in the FujiFilm F80EXR and Samsung WB35F
| F80EXR | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The FujiFilm F80EXR comes with outer dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm F80EXR and Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the F80EXR against the WB35F.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the F80EXR and WB35F is 92 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The graphic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the F80EXR and WB35F.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The F80EXR having a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Samsung WB35F will give more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older F80EXR is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Samsung WB35F |
| Alternate name | FinePix F85EXR | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-270mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 210 gr (0.46 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $400 | $130 |