Clicky

FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX3

Portability
60
Imaging
34
Features
50
Overall
40
FujiFilm FinePix HS10 front
 
Ricoh CX3 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs

FujiFilm HS10
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 666g - 131 x 91 x 126mm
  • Introduced July 2010
  • Additionally referred to as FinePix HS11
Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released June 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview

On this page, we are comparing the FujiFilm HS10 versus Ricoh CX3, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the HS10 (10MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The HS10 was introduced within a month of the CX3 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm HS10 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the HS10 grades versus the CX3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick FujiFilm HS10 over the Ricoh CX3

 HS10 CX3 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the FujiFilm HS10

 CX3 HS10 
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the FujiFilm HS10 and Ricoh CX3

 HS10 CX3 
ReleasedJuly 2010June 2010Similar age
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm HS10 has outside dimensions of 131mm x 91mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") with a weight of 666 grams (1.47 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Look at the FujiFilm HS10 versus Ricoh CX3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the HS10 vs the CX3.

FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the HS10 and CX3 is 60 and 92 respectively.

FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The graphic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the HS10 and CX3.

To sum up, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP so you can expect similar quality of photographs but you might want to take the age of the products into consideration.

FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison

FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

FujiFilm HS10 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh CX3 Portrait photography factors
40
you can focus manually
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
27
has manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with FujiFilm HS10
Street photography with Ricoh CX3
54
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
sensor is small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition in class (666g)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206g)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

FujiFilm HS10 Sports photography info
Ricoh CX3 Sports photography info
42
excellent zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with FujiFilm HS10
Travel photography with Ricoh CX3
45
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
long reach (720mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (666 grams)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
66
lighter than competition (206g)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
great zoom (300mm)
low megapixels (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm HS10 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh CX3 as a Landscape photography camera
44
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse function
42
has manual focus
rather wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm HS10 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh CX3 as a Vlogging camera
23
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic support
heavier than competition in class (666g)
30
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

FujiFilm HS10 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm HS10 and Ricoh CX3
 FujiFilm FinePix HS10Ricoh CX3
General Information
Company FujiFilm Ricoh
Model FujiFilm FinePix HS10 Ricoh CX3
Also called FinePix HS11 -
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2010-07-06 2010-06-16
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-720mm (30.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.10 m 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 666 gr (1.47 pounds) 206 gr (0.45 pounds)
Physical dimensions 131 x 91 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 4 x AA DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $900 $329