FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung WB800F
60 Imaging
34 Features
50 Overall
40
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 666g - 131 x 91 x 126mm
- Released July 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix HS11
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the FujiFilm HS10 and Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the HS10 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe HS10 was manufactured 3 years before the WB800F and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm HS10 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the HS10 grades against the WB800F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix HS10 & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm HS10 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm HS10 over the Samsung WB800F
| HS10 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the FujiFilm HS10
| WB800F | HS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 30 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm HS10 and Samsung WB800F
| HS10 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The FujiFilm HS10 offers physical dimensions of 131mm x 91mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 666 grams (1.47 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm HS10 and Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the HS10 versus the WB800F.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the HS10 and WB800F is 60 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the HS10 and WB800F.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to offer you greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The older HS10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
FujiFilm HS10 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix HS10 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix HS10 | Samsung WB800F |
| Other name | FinePix HS11 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-07-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 666g (1.47 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 131 x 91 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $900 | $300 |
