FujiFilm HS10 vs Sony H400
Portability
60 Imaging
33 Features
50 Overall
39
60 Imaging
33 Features
50 Overall
39
Portability
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
FujiFilm HS10 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
FujiFilm HS10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 666g - 131 x 91 x 126mm
- Announced July 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix HS11
Sony H400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Released February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm HS10 vs Sony H400 Overview
Lets look more closely at the FujiFilm HS10 versus Sony H400, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the HS10 (10MP) and H400 (20MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe HS10 was brought out 4 years earlier than the H400 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the HS10 scores vs the H400 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm HS10 vs Sony H400 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix HS10 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm HS10 Gallery and Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm HS10 over the Sony H400
| HS10 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the FujiFilm HS10
| H400 | HS10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm HS10 and Sony H400
| HS10 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm HS10 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and size. The FujiFilm HS10 has got external dimensions of 131mm x 91mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") with a weight of 666 grams (1.47 lbs) while the Sony H400 has specifications of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") accompanied by a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm HS10 versus Sony H400 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the HS10 compared to the H400.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the HS10 and H400 is 60 and 62 respectively.
FujiFilm HS10 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading specs. The picture here might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the HS10 and H400.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Sony H400 to offer extra detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged HS10 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
FujiFilm HS10 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm HS10 Portrait photography details
Sony H400 Portrait photography details
you can focus manually
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
includes face detection focus
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
FujiFilm HS10 Street photography features
Sony H400 Street photography features
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (666g)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competitors (628 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sports photography with FujiFilm HS10
Sports photography with Sony H400
incredible zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (25-1550mm 62.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
includes tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Travel photography with FujiFilm HS10
Travel photography with Sony H400
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
very long reach (720mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (666 grams)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long zoom (1550mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (628 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with FujiFilm HS10
Landscape photography with Sony H400
you can focus manually
pretty wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse mode
really wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm HS10 as a Vlogging camera
Sony H400 as a Vlogging camera
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external mic socket
heavier than competition (666 grams)
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
does have external microphone socket
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
more heavy than competitors (628 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm HS10 vs Sony H400 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix HS10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix HS10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Other name | FinePix HS11 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 8.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 X 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 666 grams (1.47 lb) | 628 grams (1.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 131 x 91 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $900 | $268 |