FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Fujifilm S9200
Portability
58 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
58 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs
FujiFilm HS20 EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 730g - 131 x 91 x 126mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix HS22 EXR
- Renewed by Fujifilm HS30EXR
Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Fujifilm S9200 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Fujifilm S9200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras and both are produced by FujiFilm. The resolution of the HS20 EXR (16MP) and the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) is relatively similar but the HS20 EXR (1/2") and Fujifilm S9200 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe HS20 EXR was brought out 4 years before the Fujifilm S9200 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the HS20 EXR scores vs the Fujifilm S9200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Fujifilm S9200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR & Fujifilm FinePix S9200. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm HS20 EXR Gallery & Fujifilm S9200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm HS20 EXR over the Fujifilm S9200
| HS20 EXR | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the FujiFilm HS20 EXR
| Fujifilm S9200 | HS20 EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 36 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm HS20 EXR and Fujifilm S9200
| HS20 EXR | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Fujifilm S9200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The FujiFilm HS20 EXR provides external measurements of 131mm x 91mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") having a weight of 730 grams (1.61 lbs) and the Fujifilm S9200 has sizing of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Fujifilm S9200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the HS20 EXR and the Fujifilm S9200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the HS20 EXR and Fujifilm S9200 is 58 and 61 respectively.
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Fujifilm S9200 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the HS20 EXR and Fujifilm S9200.
Clearly, both the cameras provide the same resolution albeit not the same sensor measurements. The HS20 EXR comes with the bigger sensor which will make getting shallower DOF easier. The older HS20 EXR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR Portrait photography factors
Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography factors
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
has face detect focus
exports RAW formats
small sensor size (1/2")
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
supports face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR as a Street photography camera
Fujifilm S9200 as a Street photography camera
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
small sensor size (1/2")
more heavy than competitors in class (730g)
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than average in class (670 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR Sports photography advice
Fujifilm S9200 Sports photography advice
long zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
small sensor size (1/2")
no phase detect auto focus
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
supports tracking focus
better than average battery power (500 shots)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR Travel photography info
Fujifilm S9200 Travel photography info
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (720mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors in class (730g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (670 grams)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR Landscape photography factors
Fujifilm S9200 Landscape photography factors
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
exports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2")
lack of Timelapse function
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
better than average battery power (500 per charge)
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR as a Vlogging camera
Fujifilm S9200 as a Vlogging camera
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than competitors in class (730 grams)
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
missing mic socket
heavier than average in class (670g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix HS22 EXR | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | 97 percent |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1700 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 7.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 80 fps), 320 x 112 (320 fps), 320 x 240 (160 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 730g (1.61 lbs) | 670g (1.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 131 x 91 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 photos |
| Battery type | - | AA |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $600 | $300 |
