FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990
58 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
![FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR front FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-HS20-EXR/FujiFilm-HS20-EXR-front.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare Z990 front Kodak EasyShare Z990 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-Z990/Kodak-Z990-front.jpg)
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 730g - 131 x 91 x 126mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix HS22 EXR
- Updated by Fujifilm HS30EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Released January 2011
- Additionally referred to as EasyShare Max
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Overview
The following is a extended review of the FujiFilm HS20 EXR and Kodak Z990, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the HS20 EXR (16MP) and Z990 (12MP) and the HS20 EXR (1/2") and Z990 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The HS20 EXR was launched very close to the Z990 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the HS20 EXR matches up versus the Z990 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR and Kodak EasyShare Z990. The complete galleries are available at FujiFilm HS20 EXR Gallery and Kodak Z990 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm HS20 EXR over the Kodak Z990
HS20 EXR | Z990 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the FujiFilm HS20 EXR
Z990 | HS20 EXR |
---|
Common features in the FujiFilm HS20 EXR and Kodak Z990
HS20 EXR | Z990 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | Similar generation |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm HS20 EXR features exterior dimensions of 131mm x 91mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") and a weight of 730 grams (1.61 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z990 has dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm HS20 EXR and Kodak Z990 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the HS20 EXR against the Z990.
![FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 size comparison FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-HS20-EXR-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z990-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the HS20 EXR and Z990 is 58 and 68 respectively.
![FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-HS20-EXR-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z990-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The picture here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the HS20 EXR and Z990.
All in all, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The HS20 EXR because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the FujiFilm HS20 EXR will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively.
![FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 sensor size comparison FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-HS20-EXR-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z990-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-HS20-EXR-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z990-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z990 |
Otherwise known as | FinePix HS22 EXR | EasyShare Max |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-04 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 8.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 80 fps), 320 x 112 (320 fps), 320 x 240 (160 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 730 grams (1.61 lb) | 445 grams (0.98 lb) |
Dimensions | 131 x 91 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $600 | $299 |