FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon A900
58 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 730g - 131 x 91 x 126mm
- Launched January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix HS22 EXR
- Later Model is Fujifilm HS30EXR
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Released February 2016
- Updated by Nikon A1000
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon A900 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the FujiFilm HS20 EXR versus Nikon A900, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the HS20 EXR (16MP) and the A900 (20MP) is pretty similar but the HS20 EXR (1/2") and A900 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe HS20 EXR was unveiled 6 years earlier than the A900 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm HS20 EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon A900 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the HS20 EXR scores versus the A900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon A900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR and Nikon Coolpix A900. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm HS20 EXR Gallery and Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm HS20 EXR over the Nikon A900
HS20 EXR | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the FujiFilm HS20 EXR
A900 | HS20 EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | January 2011 | More recent by 62 months | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm HS20 EXR and Nikon A900
HS20 EXR | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm HS20 EXR provides outside measurements of 131mm x 91mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") along with a weight of 730 grams (1.61 lbs) while the Nikon A900 has measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm HS20 EXR versus Nikon A900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the HS20 EXR and the A900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the HS20 EXR and A900 is 58 and 88 respectively.
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The graphic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the HS20 EXR and A900.
As you have seen, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The HS20 EXR with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Nikon A900 will deliver greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older HS20 EXR is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon A900 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
Also called | FinePix HS22 EXR | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.4-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 80 fps), 320 x 112 (320 fps), 320 x 240 (160 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 730 grams (1.61 lbs) | 289 grams (0.64 lbs) |
Dimensions | 131 x 91 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $600 | $400 |