FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon S9300
Portability
58 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
58 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
91 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon S9300 Key Specs
FujiFilm HS20 EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 730g - 131 x 91 x 126mm
- Launched January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix HS22 EXR
- Successor is Fujifilm HS30EXR
Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Launched July 2012
- Old Model is Nikon S9100
- Newer Model is Nikon S9500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon S9300 Overview
Following is a extended review of the FujiFilm HS20 EXR versus Nikon S9300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the HS20 EXR (16MP) and the S9300 (16MP) is very similar but the HS20 EXR (1/2") and S9300 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe HS20 EXR was brought out 18 months earlier than the S9300 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm HS20 EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9300 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the HS20 EXR grades against the S9300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon S9300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR and Nikon Coolpix S9300. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm HS20 EXR Gallery and Nikon S9300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm HS20 EXR over the Nikon S9300
| HS20 EXR | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the FujiFilm HS20 EXR
| S9300 | HS20 EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 18 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm HS20 EXR and Nikon S9300
| HS20 EXR | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon S9300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm HS20 EXR comes with outer dimensions of 131mm x 91mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") and a weight of 730 grams (1.61 lbs) whilst the Nikon S9300 has measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm HS20 EXR versus Nikon S9300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the HS20 EXR against the S9300.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the HS20 EXR and S9300 is 58 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon S9300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to see the gap between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The image here might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the HS20 EXR and S9300.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The HS20 EXR has the larger sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF less difficult. The more aged HS20 EXR is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon S9300 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with FujiFilm HS20 EXR
Portrait photography with Nikon S9300
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
sensor size is very small (1/2")
decent MP (16MP)
supports face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR Street photography details
Nikon S9300 Street photography details
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
sensor size is very small (1/2")
heavier than others (730 grams)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (215g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR Sports photography highlights
Nikon S9300 Sports photography highlights
amazing zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2")
lack of phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
supports tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (200 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Travel photography with FujiFilm HS20 EXR
Travel photography with Nikon S9300
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
great zoom (720mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than others (730g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lighter than average in class (215 grams)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
great reach (450mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
terrible battery power (200 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with FujiFilm HS20 EXR
Landscape photography with Nikon S9300
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2")
no Time Lapse mode
rather wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
terrible battery power (200 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR Vlogging info
Nikon S9300 Vlogging info
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no external mic jack
heavier than others (730 grams)
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (215 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Nikon S9300 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR | Nikon Coolpix S9300 |
| Also called as | FinePix HS22 EXR | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2012-07-16 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 6.9fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 80 fps), 320 x 112 (320 fps), 320 x 240 (160 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 730 grams (1.61 lb) | 215 grams (0.47 lb) |
| Dimensions | 131 x 91 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $600 | $249 |
