FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Olympus SP-810 UZ
Portability
58 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
58 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Portability
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs
FujiFilm HS20 EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 730g - 131 x 91 x 126mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix HS22 EXR
- Replacement is Fujifilm HS30EXR
Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Announced July 2011
- Old Model is Olympus SP-800 UZ
Photography Glossary FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the FujiFilm HS20 EXR and Olympus SP-810 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the HS20 EXR (16MP) and the SP-810 UZ (14MP) is pretty close but the HS20 EXR (1/2") and SP-810 UZ (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe HS20 EXR was brought out 6 months before the SP-810 UZ and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the HS20 EXR matches up vs the SP-810 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR & Olympus SP-810 UZ. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm HS20 EXR Gallery & Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm HS20 EXR over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
| HS20 EXR | SP-810 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the FujiFilm HS20 EXR
| SP-810 UZ | HS20 EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm HS20 EXR and Olympus SP-810 UZ
| HS20 EXR | SP-810 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | July 2011 | Same age |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm HS20 EXR has got outer dimensions of 131mm x 91mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") and a weight of 730 grams (1.61 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-810 UZ has dimensions of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm HS20 EXR and Olympus SP-810 UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the HS20 EXR vs the SP-810 UZ.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the HS20 EXR and SP-810 UZ is 58 and 78 respectively.
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching specifications. The picture below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the HS20 EXR and SP-810 UZ.
Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The HS20 EXR due to its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the FujiFilm HS20 EXR will provide you with extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively.
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SP-810 UZ as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
tiny sensor (1/2")
megapixel count decent (14MP)
provides face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR Street photography highlights
Olympus SP-810 UZ Street photography highlights
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
tiny sensor (1/2")
more heavy than competitors (730g)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR Sports photography details
Olympus SP-810 UZ Sports photography details
amazing zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
tiny sensor (1/2")
lack of phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (24-864mm 36.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
low max shutter speed (1/1,200s)
continuous shooting slow (0.7 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR Travel photography factors
Olympus SP-810 UZ Travel photography factors
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
long reach (720mm)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (730 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
long zoom (864mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR Landscape photography details
Olympus SP-810 UZ Landscape photography details
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor (1/2")
missing Timelapse recording
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
manual mode not available
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm HS20 EXR as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SP-810 UZ as a Vlogging camera
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (730g)
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR | Olympus SP-810 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR | Olympus SP-810 UZ |
| Also referred to as | FinePix HS22 EXR | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2011-07-27 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-864mm (36.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.9-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 0.7 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 6.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 80 fps), 320 x 112 (320 fps), 320 x 240 (160 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 730 gr (1.61 pounds) | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 131 x 91 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $600 | $280 |