FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z950
96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Announced January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix JV205
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Released June 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the FujiFilm JV200 versus Kodak Z950, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the JV200 (14MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe JV200 was revealed 7 months later than the Z950 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the JV200 scores against the Z950 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix JV200 and Kodak EasyShare Z950. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm JV200 Gallery and Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Kodak Z950
| JV200 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the FujiFilm JV200
| Z950 | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the FujiFilm JV200 and Kodak Z950
| JV200 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm JV200 offers outer dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Kodak Z950 has dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm JV200 versus Kodak Z950 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the JV200 versus the Z950.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the JV200 and Z950 is 96 and 89 respectively.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the JV200 and Z950.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the FujiFilm JV200 to resolve extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger JV200 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Alternate name | FinePix JV205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 243 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | - | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $49 | $250 |