FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z980
96 Imaging
36 Features
18 Overall
28
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z980 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix JV205
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Revealed January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z980 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z980, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the JV200 (14MP) and the Z980 (12MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe JV200 was unveiled 2 years after the Z980 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the JV200 grades against the Z980 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z980 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix JV200 and Kodak EasyShare Z980. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm JV200 Gallery and Kodak Z980 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Kodak Z980
| JV200 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 25 months |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 201k | Sharper display (+29k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the FujiFilm JV200
| Z980 | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the FujiFilm JV200 and Kodak Z980
| JV200 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z980 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm JV200 enjoys outside dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Kodak Z980 has proportions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z980 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the JV200 and the Z980.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the JV200 and Z980 is 96 and 68 respectively.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z980 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The picture underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the JV200 and Z980.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the FujiFilm JV200 to render extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer JV200 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z980 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm JV200 vs Kodak Z980 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Kodak EasyShare Z980 |
| Also called | FinePix JV205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 201 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 6.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 445g (0.98 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $49 | $249 |