FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon W300
96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon W300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix JV205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2017
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon W300 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the FujiFilm JV200 versus Nikon W300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Nikon. The image resolution of the JV200 (14MP) and the W300 (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe JV200 was manufactured 7 years earlier than the W300 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the JV200 grades vs the W300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon W300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix JV200 & Nikon Coolpix W300. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm JV200 Gallery & Nikon W300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Nikon W300
| JV200 | W300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the FujiFilm JV200
| W300 | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 77 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm JV200 and Nikon W300
| JV200 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon W300 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm JV200 features outer dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Nikon W300 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm JV200 versus Nikon W300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the JV200 vs the W300.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the JV200 and W300 is 96 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon W300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the JV200 and W300.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Nikon W300 to show greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older JV200 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon W300 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
FujiFilm JV200 vs Nikon W300 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Nikon Coolpix W300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Nikon Coolpix W300 |
| Also Known as | FinePix JV205 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2017-05-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 231 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | 280 images |
| Style of battery | AA | Built-in |
| Battery ID | - | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $49 | $387 |