FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3
96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28883/2888300fbfdb590a0ad148bec430356150193387" alt="FujiFilm FinePix JV200 front FujiFilm FinePix JV200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix JV205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the FujiFilm JV200 versus Olympus SH-3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the JV200 (14MP) and the SH-3 (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The JV200 was announced 6 years prior to the SH-3 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the JV200 scores vs the SH-3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix JV200 & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The whole galleries are provided at FujiFilm JV200 Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Olympus SH-3
JV200 | SH-3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the FujiFilm JV200
SH-3 | JV200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 62 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm JV200 and Olympus SH-3
JV200 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm JV200 features external dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm JV200 versus Olympus SH-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the JV200 compared to the SH-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79f92/79f92d715038f13d896deaffd25df5e4b7edbb0d" alt="FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the JV200 and SH-3 is 96 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02f9f/02f9ff4db1e1766c7998c9e7006dc1c03cce302d" alt="FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The picture underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the JV200 and SH-3.
All in all, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus SH-3 to provide you with extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged JV200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f37e/9f37e7c1c827f9976e71d41f33be3c6ffc90cc3c" alt="FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a193/3a193023d7ff49135deac46427bc65f607ef7bd0" alt="FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Also called | FinePix JV205 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2016-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 11.5 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 271g (0.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 pictures | 380 pictures |
Form of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD / SDHC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $49 | $579 |