FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus TG-310
Portability
96 Imaging
36 Features
18 Overall
28
96 Imaging
36 Features
18 Overall
28
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
FujiFilm JV200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix JV205
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the FujiFilm JV200 versus Olympus TG-310, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the JV200 (14MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe JV200 was unveiled around the same time to the TG-310 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the JV200 matches up against the TG-310 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix JV200 & Olympus TG-310. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm JV200 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Olympus TG-310
| JV200 | TG-310 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the FujiFilm JV200
| TG-310 | JV200 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm JV200 and Olympus TG-310
| JV200 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | January 2011 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The FujiFilm JV200 enjoys physical dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm JV200 versus Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the JV200 vs the TG-310.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the JV200 and TG-310 is 96 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the JV200 and TG-310.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photographs although you should really consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm JV200 Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography advice
megapixel count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
MP count decent (14MP)
comes with face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
FujiFilm JV200 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Street photography camera
lighter than average in class (125 grams)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lighter than average in class (155 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sports photography with FujiFilm JV200
Sports photography with Olympus TG-310
megapixel count good (14MP)
offers tracking focus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery (180 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
comes with tracking focus
environment proof
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery (150 per charge)
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
FujiFilm JV200 Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography factors
lighter than average in class (125 grams)
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
terrible battery (180 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
lighter than average in class (155g)
environment proof
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
not so great battery (150 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm JV200 Landscape photography advice
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography advice
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
terrible battery (180 per charge)
missing Time Lapse mode
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
environment proof
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7")
manual mode not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
not so great battery (150 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm JV200 Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-310 Vlogging factors
lighter than average in class (125 grams)
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic support
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
lighter than average in class (155g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Also called as | FinePix JV205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 155g (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | 150 shots |
| Type of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $49 | $0 |