FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus VR-330
Portability
96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
FujiFilm JV200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix JV205
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus VR-320
Photography Glossary FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus VR-330, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the JV200 (14MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is fairly close and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe JV200 was brought out very close to the VR-330 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the JV200 scores against the VR-330 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix JV200 & Olympus VR-330. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm JV200 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Olympus VR-330
| JV200 | VR-330 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the FujiFilm JV200
| VR-330 | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm JV200 and Olympus VR-330
| JV200 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | February 2011 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm JV200 comes with exterior dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus VR-330 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the JV200 vs the VR-330.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the JV200 and VR-330 is 96 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching specs. The image here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the JV200 and VR-330.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP so you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you would want to factor the age of the cameras into account.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm JV200 Portrait photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography advice
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
good resolution (14MP)
features face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm JV200
Street photography with Olympus VR-330
lighter than competition (125 grams)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (158 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
FujiFilm JV200 Sports photography features
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography features
decent megapixels (14MP)
supports tracking autofocus
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (180 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with FujiFilm JV200
Travel photography with Olympus VR-330
lighter than competition (125g)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
bad battery pack (180 shots)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
lighter than average (158 grams)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm JV200 Landscape photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography advice
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
bad battery pack (180 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse function
fairly wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm JV200 Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging advice
lighter than competition (125 grams)
wide angle not good (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic support
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
lighter than average (158 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Also Known as | FinePix JV205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | - |
| Type of battery | AA | - |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $49 | $220 |