FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Released January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix JV205
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's look more closely at the FujiFilm JV200 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the JV200 (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty close but the JV200 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe JV200 was announced 23 months before the XZ-2 iHS which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the JV200 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix JV200 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm JV200 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| JV200 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the FujiFilm JV200
| XZ-2 iHS | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 23 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm JV200 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| JV200 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and size. The FujiFilm JV200 has got exterior dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm JV200 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the JV200 versus the XZ-2 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the JV200 and XZ-2 iHS is 96 and 85 respectively.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The picture below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the JV200 and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The JV200 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the FujiFilm JV200 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged JV200 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm JV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Also referred to as | FinePix JV205 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 346g (0.76 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | 340 photographs |
| Battery type | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $49 | $450 |