FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh CX2
96 Imaging
36 Features
18 Overall
28
93 Imaging
31 Features
35 Overall
32
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix JV205
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh CX2, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the JV200 (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe JV200 was revealed 17 months later than the CX2 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise summary of how the JV200 matches up vs the CX2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix JV200 & Ricoh CX2. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm JV200 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Ricoh CX2
| JV200 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | August 2009 | Fresher by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the FujiFilm JV200
| CX2 | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm JV200 and Ricoh CX2
| JV200 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm JV200 provides physical measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the JV200 versus the CX2.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the JV200 and CX2 is 96 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the JV200 and CX2.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the FujiFilm JV200 to show more detail because of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more modern JV200 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix JV205 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 185g (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | - |
| Battery form | AA | - |
| Battery model | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $49 | $341 |