FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-M1
96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix JV205
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here, we are matching up the FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the JV200 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe JV200 was introduced 4 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the JV200 grades against the WG-M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix JV200 & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are provided at FujiFilm JV200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| JV200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the FujiFilm JV200
| WG-M1 | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 44 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm JV200 and Ricoh WG-M1
| JV200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm JV200 has exterior dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the JV200 compared to the WG-M1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the JV200 and WG-M1 is 96 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by going through specifications. The graphic here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the JV200 and WG-M1.
Plainly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of files but you would want to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older JV200 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm JV200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Also called as | FinePix JV205 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | 350 images |
| Battery form | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $49 | $2,000 |