FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB800F
96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix JV205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the FujiFilm JV200 and Samsung WB800F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the JV200 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty comparable and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe JV200 was unveiled 24 months before the WB800F which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the JV200 scores vs the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix JV200 and Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm JV200 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Samsung WB800F
| JV200 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the FujiFilm JV200
| WB800F | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm JV200 and Samsung WB800F
| JV200 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm JV200 features external dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm JV200 and Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the JV200 and the WB800F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the JV200 and WB800F is 96 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the JV200 and WB800F.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Samsung WB800F to show greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older JV200 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Samsung WB800F |
| Also Known as | FinePix JV205 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $49 | $300 |