FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135
95 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
![FujiFilm FinePix JX300 front FujiFilm FinePix JX300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX300/FujiFilm-JX300-front.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare C135 front Kodak EasyShare C135 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-C135/Kodak-C135-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.6-6.2) lens
- 130g - 94 x 56 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix JX305
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the FujiFilm JX300 versus Kodak C135, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the JX300 (14MP) and the C135 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The JX300 was brought out 12 months prior to the C135 and they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the JX300 grades vs the C135 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix JX300 & Kodak EasyShare C135. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm JX300 Gallery & Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JX300 over the Kodak C135
JX300 | C135 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 112k | Crisper screen (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the FujiFilm JX300
C135 | JX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 12 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm JX300 and Kodak C135
JX300 | C135 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm JX300 has outside measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Kodak C135 has specifications of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm JX300 versus Kodak C135 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the JX300 versus the C135.
![FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 size comparison FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX300-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-C135-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the JX300 and C135 is 95 and 92 respectively.
![FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX300-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-C135-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the JX300 and C135.
As you can see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same MP and you can expect comparable quality of files however you will want to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged JX300 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
![FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 sensor size comparison FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX300-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-C135-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX300-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-C135-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak C135 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix JX300 | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix JX300 | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
Also Known as | FinePix JX305 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1250 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.6-6.2 | f/3.0 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.4 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 112 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1800 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 130 grams (0.29 lbs) | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $110 | $0 |