FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-320
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 168g - 97 x 57 x 29mm
- Released February 2010
- Other Name is FinePix JZ305
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the FujiFilm JZ300 versus Olympus TG-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the JZ300 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe JZ300 was manufactured 23 months earlier than the TG-320 which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the JZ300 matches up vs the TG-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix JZ300 and Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm JZ300 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JZ300 over the Olympus TG-320
| JZ300 | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the FujiFilm JZ300
| TG-320 | JZ300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 23 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm JZ300 and Olympus TG-320
| JZ300 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The FujiFilm JZ300 has external dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 29mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm JZ300 versus Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the JZ300 vs the TG-320.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the JZ300 and TG-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the JZ300 and TG-320.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus TG-320 to offer more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged JZ300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JZ300 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix JZ300 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Alternative name | FinePix JZ305 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 29mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $180 | $0 |