FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 168g - 97 x 57 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix JZ305
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Photography Glossary FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the FujiFilm JZ300 and Olympus TG-630 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the JZ300 (12MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is pretty well matched and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe JZ300 was announced 3 years earlier than the TG-630 iHS and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the JZ300 scores against the TG-630 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix JZ300 and Olympus TG-630 iHS. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm JZ300 Gallery and Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JZ300 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| JZ300 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the FujiFilm JZ300
| TG-630 iHS | JZ300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 35 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm JZ300 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| JZ300 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm JZ300 has got external dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 29mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has proportions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm JZ300 and Olympus TG-630 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the JZ300 against the TG-630 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the JZ300 and TG-630 iHS is 93 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at specs. The photograph below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the JZ300 and TG-630 iHS.
All in all, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution so you should expect similar quality of photographs but you will need to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The older JZ300 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm JZ300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JZ300 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix JZ300 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Also called as | FinePix JZ305 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 29mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $180 | $200 |