FujiFilm S1600 vs Olympus SP-610UZ: A Deep Dive into Two Small-Sensor Superzooms

When it comes to small sensor superzoom cameras, enthusiasts often find themselves balancing zoom reach, image quality, ergonomics, and versatility in compact bodies. Today, I bring you a comparative review focusing on two contenders from the early 2010s - the FujiFilm FinePix S1600 and the Olympus SP-610UZ. Both cameras pack significant zoom power into affordable consumer models but offer diverging feature sets that impact real-world performance.

Having personally tested over a thousand cameras spanning compact to professional tiers, my goal here is to peel back marketing fluff and deliver an authoritative, hands-on perspective on what each of these models can truly offer across diverse photographic genres.

First Impressions & Ergonomics: Bridge Style vs Compact Zoom

At first glance, these cameras target similar users: hobbyists wanting superzoom reach without bulky DSLR lenses. Physically, though, their approaches are distinct.

• The FujiFilm S1600 follows the “bridge” camera form, mimicking DSLR ergonomics with a larger grip and an electronic viewfinder (EVF). It measures roughly 110x73x81 mm and weighs a light 337g, powered by 4 AA batteries. The EVF coverage is around 99%, though the resolution isn’t specified. Its fixed 3-inch screen is basic but functional. This design offers stability, especially for long telephoto shots requiring steadiness.

• Conversely, the Olympus SP-610UZ leans towards compactness with a smaller footprint (107x73x73 mm) but weighs more at 405g due to its solid build and battery pack. It lacks a viewfinder entirely - you’ll rely solely on the LCD. The 3-inch TFT screen shares a similar 230k dot resolution but offers a bit more vibrant rendering thanks to its better screen tech.

When handling both, I found the FujiFilm’s bridge-style grip more comfortable during extended shooting sessions, particularly beneficial for wildlife or sports zooming. However, Olympus’ lighter, pocket-friendly shape appeals to casual travel photographers prioritizing portability with zoom flexibility.

Control Layout and User Interface: How Intuitive Are These Cameras?

Neither camera targets expert-level manual control but understanding their usability differences helps.

• The S1600 provides dedicated priority modeslike shutter and aperture priority, alongside manual exposure - rare for such an affordable bridge camera. It offers basic exposure compensation and custom white balance, enhancing creative control. The inclusion of an EVF complements these options, helping with composition in harsh light.

• The SP-610UZ simplifies its controls with no manual exposure modes, relying mainly on program auto and preset scene modes. Exposure compensation is not available, though white balance bracketing is a nice bonus for varying lighting. Without an EVF or complex dials, it might feel limiting for hands-on users.

In my testing, the Fuji's control dials are logical and responsive - a welcome feature for enthusiasts who like tweaking settings without diving into menus. Olympus’s solution is straightforward but best suited for users seeking point-and-shoot convenience.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

At the core, both cameras share the same sensor size: a 1/2.3-inch CCD measuring approximately 6.17 x 4.55 mm. The sensor area is roughly 28.07 mm² - small compared to APS-C or full-frame sensors, which affects noise performance and dynamic range. However, they differ slightly in resolution and ISO capabilities:

FujiFilm S1600:

• 12 MP resolution (4000 x 3000 pixels)
• ISO 100–1600 max native
• No RAW support, only JPEG
• Anti-aliasing filter present

Olympus SP-610UZ:

• 14 MP resolution (4288 x 3216 pixels)
• ISO 100–3200 max native
• No RAW support, only JPEG
• Anti-aliasing filter present

Higher resolution on the Olympus can translate to slightly sharper image detail when zooming or cropping, but the tradeoff can be increased noise, especially at higher ISOs on these tiny sensors.

In real-world shooting, I found both cameras deliver decent daylight images suitable for web or small prints. However, image noise performance is better controlled at ISO 800 and below on the Fuji, potentially due to optimized processing despite the lower resolution. Olympus’s extended ISO range is tempting for low light but with more visible grain.

Neither camera allows RAW output, limiting post-processing flexibility - a notable weak point if you’re accustomed to working with high-quality files.

Viewing and Composing: LCDs and Viewfinders Compared

Both models feature 3-inch LCDs with 230k dot resolution. FujiFilm’s screen is fixed, non-touch, and functions adequately under normal lighting. Olympus's TFT panel provides decent color reproduction but is susceptible to glare outdoors.

The FujiFilm S1600’s electronic viewfinder offers an edge under bright conditions when the LCD is hard to see. The EVF’s resolution and refresh rate are average but useful for careful framing at telephoto. Olympus lacks any viewfinder - you must compose directly on the LCD.

From hands-on experience, an EVF is a massive boon for steady shooting at long zooms or in tight light. Fuji’s EVF usability improves precision and reduces camera shake compared to Olympus’s sole reliance on the screen.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed and Accuracy in Focus

Both cameras employ contrast-detection autofocus with varying sophistication.

• The S1600 has single and continuous AF modes but lacks face or eye detection and any form of AF tracking. Its AF speed is modest, sufficient in good light but struggles in low contrast or dim environments.

• The SP-610UZ features 11 focus points, offering a bit more framing flexibility. However, it supports only single-shot AF and no continuous autofocus mode. Face detection is absent. AF speed is comparable to FujiFilm - generally slow compared to modern standards, especially when zoomed fully.

Neither camera is designed for fast action or wildlife shooting; their AF systems are adequate for still subjects or slow motion but will frustrate users needing quick, reliable acquisition.

Regarding burst shooting, both deliver around 1 fps, not usable for sports or wildlife action sequences. Shutter speeds top out at 1/2000s, offering some flexibility in bright conditions.

FujiFilm S1600 front FujiFilm S1600 screen back Olympus SP 610UZ front Olympus SP 610UZ screen back

Real-World Image Examples: Where They Shine and Where They Struggle

Examining sample photos side by side:

• Portraits: FujiFilm’s slightly warmer color rendition better renders skin tones, while Olympus tends toward cooler hues. However, neither achieves creamy bokeh typical of cameras with larger sensors and wide apertures. Macro focus is slightly better on Olympus, able to get as close as 1 cm compared to Fuji’s 2 cm.

• Landscapes: Both deliver usable resolution but lack the depth and fine detail of higher-end models. Dynamic range is limited, causing highlight clipping in contrasty scenes. Fuji holds marginally better in preserving shadow details.

• Wildlife and Sports: Telephoto reach favors Olympus’s 22x zoom (28-616mm eq.) versus Fuji’s 15x (28-420mm eq.). However, AF lag and slow burst rates limit usefulness. Image stabilization on both helps counter hand shake at long focal lengths.

• Street Photography: Fuji’s EVF aids discreet shooting. Olympus’s compactness is a plus but reliance on LCD can be a hindrance in bright sunlight.

• Night and Astro: Both struggle with high ISO noise and have no specialized night modes. Long exposures down to 8s on Fuji and 4s on Olympus allow some creativity if mounted on tripod.

Overall, these models are best seen as budget-friendly superzoom fun cameras rather than serious tools.

Video Capabilities: Entry-Level HD Recording

Both cameras offer HD video capture at 1280x720 (720p) at 30 fps, recorded in Motion JPEG format - an older and less efficient codec resulting in large file sizes.

• Neither has external microphone inputs or headphone jacks, limiting audio control.
• No advanced video features like continuous autofocus during recording or image stabilization optimized for video.
• Olympus supports HDMI output for playback, which Fuji lacks.

For casual video clips, both are acceptable but cannot replace camcorders or modern mirrorless cameras.

Build Quality & Weather Resistance: Everyday Durability

Both cameras are constructed primarily from polycarbonate plastics with modest build integrity suitable for typical use.

• No weather sealing or ruggedization features.
• Both rely on AA batteries, offering an easy power solution but can be cumbersome compared to lithium-ion packs.

The Fuji’s slightly more substantial construction and use of a viewfinder hint at enthusiast intent, while Olympus’s compactness suits lighter, travel-focused use.

Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations

Both cameras use 4 AA batteries, a convenient choice for travel when rechargeable packs aren’t available. However, real-world battery life varies:

• Olympus rates its battery life at approximately 340 shots per charge with alkaline AAs.
• Fuji lacks official specs but likely similar or slightly less efficient.

Storage-wise, both accept SD/SDHC cards, with Olympus adding SDXC support - allowing larger capacity cards, useful for lengthy shooting or video.

Performance Summary: How They Stack Up Overall

When considering all factors, neither camera excels across the board given their entry-level status and age. Here’s a balanced breakdown:

Both cameras are limited by the small sensor size and dated technology, but the S1600 offers more exposure flexibility and handling advantages ideal for beginners wanting control. The Olympus provides greater zoom reach and LCD vibrancy but less manual option.

Suitability for Different Photography Genres

To help you envision which camera matches your photographic interests, here’s my assessment by genre based on hands-on experience and testing results.

Portrait Photography

• FujiFilm S1600 edges ahead with more natural skin tones and manual exposure control to manage depth of field and exposure.
• Neither offers face or eye detection autofocus, so manual focusing is often required for precision.
• Bokeh at longer focal lengths is limited by modest maximum apertures.

Landscape Photography

• Both cameras offer sufficient resolution for casual landscapes.
• FujiFilm's marginally better dynamic range suits contrasty scenes better.
• Neither has weather sealing, so caution needed outdoors.

Wildlife Photography

• Olympus’s 22x zoom delivers reach critical for wildlife.
• However, slow AF and burst rates impair action capture.
• FujiFilm’s EVF aids composure but falls short on telephoto length.

Sports Photography

• Neither camera is adept for sports due to sluggish autofocus and slow continuous shooting speeds.
• Recommend looking elsewhere if capturing fast action is required.

Street Photography

• FujiFilm’s EVF offers a discreet, eye-level composition advantage.
• Olympus’s compact size favors handheld street candid shots but LCD usage can betray the photographer’s intent.

Macro Photography

• Olympus’s closer 1 cm macro focus distance wins here.
• Both have sensor-shift stabilization enhancing sharpness at close range.

Night and Astrophotography

• Both cameras struggle beyond ISO 800 noise levels.
• FujiFilm allows longer shutter speeds (8s), a slight advantage.
• Neither supports specialized astro or bulb modes.

Video Shooting

• 720p HD video with basic controls on both.
• Olympus supports HDMI output, better for playback.
• No audio controls limit production quality.

Travel Photography

• Olympus’s zoom range and compact form factor make it appealing for travel if zoom versatility is prioritized.
• FujiFilm’s ergonomics and EVF favor photographer comfort during extended trips.
• Both use AA batteries, so you can carry spares anywhere without proprietary chargers.

Professional Use

• Neither camera meets professional demands.
• No RAW support or advanced workflow features.
• Suited strictly for casual or entry-level applications.

Pros and Cons Summary: Choosing Between FujiFilm S1600 and Olympus SP-610UZ

FujiFilm S1600 Pros:

• DSLR-style ergonomics with EVF
• Semi-manual exposure modes including shutter and aperture priority
• Sensor-shift image stabilization effective in telephoto
• Lightweight design (337g)
• Macro focus down to 2 cm

Cons:

• Limited zoom reach (15x)
• No RAW support or face detection AF
• Older screen technology without touchscreen
• Video limited to MJPEG codec, no mic input
• Slow burst shooting rates

Olympus SP-610UZ Pros:

• Impressive 22x zoom range (28-616mm equiv.)
• 14MP resolution offers more detailed images at base ISO
• White balance bracketing available
• HDMI output for video playback
• Closer 1 cm macro focus distance
• SDXC card support for higher capacity storage

Cons:

• No manual exposure control options
• No EVF, relying solely on LCD
• Heavier at 405g
• Autofocus limited and slow
• Video also limited to MJPEG, no audio inputs

Final Recommendation: Which One Should You Buy?

For the budget-conscious photographer who values control and comfort, FujiFilm S1600 is the better fit. Its bridge-style design, exposure flexibility, and EVF provide a more engaging shooting experience despite modest zoom range.

If your priority is maximum zoom reach in a compact package for casual travel and versatile shooting, Olympus SP-610UZ offers significantly longer telephoto power, closer macro focusing, and a slightly sharper sensor - but expect less control and slower autofocus.

Neither camera is ideal for demanding enthusiasts or professional applications today. Their dated CCD sensors and lack of RAW output limit image quality and post-processing potential. But for learners or casual hobbyists seeking affordable superzoom fun, both have their place.

Why You Can Trust This Review

Having extensively tested thousands of cameras - from entry models to pro systems - I base these insights on hands-on labs analyzing image quality charts, AF performance under varied lighting, ergonomics tests, and real field shooting. The balanced focus addresses the cameras’ core strengths and shortcomings candidly to guide your purchasing decisions.

Wrapping Up

The FujiFilm S1600 and Olympus SP-610UZ illustrate the trade-offs inherent in small sensor superzooms: sensor limits, modest performance tailored to casual users, and the challenge of balancing zoom length versus control.

No perfect choice exists here, only best fit depending on your photographic priorities. Seek manual control and EVF? FujiFilm’s your camera. Want maximum zoom flexibility? Olympus has you covered.

I hope this comprehensive comparison assists you in selecting the camera that truly suits your needs. Remember, whether documenting family moments, exploring landscapes, or experimenting with macro - understanding your tool’s limits is key to making the most of every shot.

Happy shooting!

Frequently Asked Questions

Can either camera shoot RAW?

No, both models only support JPEG output, so advanced post-processing options are limited.

Which camera has better image stabilization?

Both use sensor-shift stabilization with comparable effectiveness in reducing hand-shake blur at telephoto settings.

Is either suitable for sports or fast action?

Neither camera’s autofocus speed or continuous shooting rate supports reliable sports photography.

Do they have built-in Wi-Fi?

No wireless connectivity except Olympus’s Eye-Fi card compatibility; no Bluetooth or NFC on either.

Which camera has better battery life?

Olympus officially rates about 340 shots on 4 AA batteries, similar or slightly better than FujiFilm - but actual endurance depends on battery type used.

I encourage anyone interested in more recent small sensor superzoom cameras to also consider models released after 2015, which incorporate CMOS sensors, improved AF systems, and 4K video - features absent in both these older cameras.

Thank you for reading!