FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W
78 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c77a/8c77aadddb2dd83c184ebc98b6222f9d6a0cd221" alt="FujiFilm FinePix S1600 front FujiFilm FinePix S1600 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47f7d/47f7d7b1e27877de843384ed6303648cfc08aee4" alt="Samsung HZ35W front Samsung HZ35W front"
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F4.0-4.8) lens
- 337g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Also Known as FinePix S1770
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Additionally Known as WB650
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below, we are looking at the FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S1600 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is very comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The S1600 was unveiled 4 months prior to the HZ35W so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S1600 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the S1600 matches up versus the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S1600 and Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S1600 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S1600 over the Samsung HZ35W
S1600 | HZ35W |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the FujiFilm S1600
HZ35W | S1600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S1600 and Samsung HZ35W
S1600 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2010 | ![]() | June 2010 | Same generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S1600 offers outer dimensions of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") along with a weight of 337 grams (0.74 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the S1600 versus the HZ35W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16a4d/16a4d95c896d3a652c660daed3f98237428917e9" alt="FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the S1600 and HZ35W is 78 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9e15/f9e15231532c2527feb45a3589879eace9afb535" alt="FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S1600 and HZ35W.
All in all, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution so you should expect comparable quality of images although you need to factor the release date of the cameras into account.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0a16/d0a16254adb18952751f5200ae14161205b7fd1f" alt="FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afb29/afb29ff2f0b3d5f9760a1058c7ab2045f454474f" alt="FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
FujiFilm S1600 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S1600 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S1600 | Samsung HZ35W |
Also called as | FinePix S1770 | WB650 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/4.0-4.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 99 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.40 m | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 337 gr (0.74 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $130 | $300 |