FujiFilm S200EXR vs Kodak Z981
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Kodak Z981 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally Known as FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Announced July 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm S200EXR vs Kodak Z981 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Kodak Z981, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the S200EXR (12MP) and the Z981 (14MP) is very well matched but the S200EXR (1/1.6") and Z981 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S200EXR was introduced 11 months earlier than the Z981 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the S200EXR grades versus the Z981 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm S200EXR vs Kodak Z981 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR and Kodak EasyShare Z981. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery and Kodak Z981 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Kodak Z981
| S200EXR | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 201k | Sharper display (+29k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| Z981 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2010 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 11 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Kodak Z981
| S200EXR | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Kodak Z981 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S200EXR has got exterior dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) and the Kodak Z981 has sizing of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Kodak Z981 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the S200EXR vs the Z981.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and Z981 is 54 and 66 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Kodak Z981 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200EXR and Z981.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The S200EXR having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Kodak Z981 will give you greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The older S200EXR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Kodak Z981 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Kodak Z981 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z981 |
| Also Known as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 201k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m | 6.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 865g (1.91 lb) | 540g (1.19 lb) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-140 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $500 | $299 |