FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
![FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR/FujiFilm-S200EXR-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix A1000 front Nikon Coolpix A1000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-A1000/Nikon-A1000-front.jpg)
86 Imaging
43 Features
64 Overall
51
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 330g - 114 x 72 x 41mm
- Launched January 2019
- Previous Model is Nikon A900
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Nikon. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and A1000 (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and A1000 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The S200EXR was announced 10 years before the A1000 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon A1000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the S200EXR scores vs the A1000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Nikon Coolpix A1000. The whole galleries are provided at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Nikon A1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Nikon A1000
S200EXR | A1000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon A1000 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
A1000 | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2019 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 115 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Nikon A1000
S200EXR | A1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S200EXR has got exterior dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Nikon A1000 has proportions of 114mm x 72mm x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the S200EXR vs the A1000.
![FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 size comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-A1000-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S200EXR and A1000 is 54 and 86 respectively.
![FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-A1000-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The picture underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S200EXR and A1000.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S200EXR with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Nikon A1000 will offer you greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged S200EXR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
![FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 sensor size comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-A1000-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-A1000-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon A1000 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Nikon Coolpix A1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Nikon Coolpix A1000 |
Otherwise known as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2019-01-18 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.4-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m | 6.00 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | EN-EL12 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | No |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 865 gr (1.91 lbs) | 330 gr (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 114 x 72 x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-140 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (3 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $500 | $477 |