FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon S9500
54 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
92 Imaging
41 Features
37 Overall
39
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon S9500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-550mm (F) lens
- 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
- Previous Model is Nikon S9300
- Newer Model is Nikon S9700
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon S9500 Overview
Here, we are matching up the FujiFilm S200EXR and Nikon S9500, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Nikon. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and S9500 (18MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and S9500 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S200EXR was introduced 4 years before the S9500 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9500 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the S200EXR scores vs the S9500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon S9500 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR and Nikon Coolpix S9500. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery and Nikon S9500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Nikon S9500
| S200EXR | S9500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| S9500 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | July 2009 | Newer by 42 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Nikon S9500
| S200EXR | S9500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon S9500 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S200EXR has outside dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") along with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) and the Nikon S9500 has dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm S200EXR and Nikon S9500 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the S200EXR against the S9500.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S200EXR and S9500 is 54 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon S9500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specs. The picture underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200EXR and S9500.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The S200EXR using its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Nikon S9500 will give you more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged S200EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon S9500 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon S9500 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Nikon Coolpix S9500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Nikon Coolpix S9500 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2013-01-29 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 25-550mm (22.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | OLED monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 7.5 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 865 grams (1.91 lbs) | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-140 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $500 | $230 |