Clicky

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ

Portability
54
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front
 
Olympus SP-565UZ front
Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs

FujiFilm S200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
  • 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Other Name is FinePix S205EXR
Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Released January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview

Let's look a little more closely at the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the S200EXR (12MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is very well matched but the S200EXR (1/1.6") and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The S200EXR was manufactured 7 months later than the SP-565UZ so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the S200EXR scores against the SP-565UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

				

Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 S200EXR SP-565UZ 
ReleasedJuly 2009January 2009Fresher by 7 months
Display size2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the FujiFilm S200EXR

 SP-565UZ S200EXR 

Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Olympus SP-565UZ

 S200EXR SP-565UZ 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S200EXR has got outer dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has proportions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

Analyze the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Olympus SP-565UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the S200EXR against the SP-565UZ.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S200EXR and SP-565UZ is 54 and 72 respectively.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S200EXR and SP-565UZ.

As you can tell, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S200EXR featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the FujiFilm S200EXR will give you more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The newer S200EXR provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Portrait photography highlights
Olympus SP-565UZ Portrait photography highlights
45
manual focus
provides face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/1.6")
39
manual focus
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Street photography information
Olympus SP-565UZ Street photography information
45
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/1.6")
more heavy than competition in class (865g)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Sports photography advice
Olympus SP-565UZ Sports photography advice
34
great zoom range (31-436mm 14.1 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/1.6")
lacks phase detect auto focus
33
long zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
max frames per second very slow (1.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Travel photography factors
Olympus SP-565UZ Travel photography factors
38
flash built-in
great reach (436mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (865 grams)
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
52
has built in flash
really wide (26mm)
very long reach (520mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Landscape photography advice
Olympus SP-565UZ Landscape photography advice
34
manual focus
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/1.6")
lack of Timelapse function
40
manual focus
really wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Vlogging highlights
Olympus SP-565UZ Vlogging highlights
19
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
wide angle not the best (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly display
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (865 grams)
24
really wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of mic port
Photography Glossary

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm S200EXR and Olympus SP-565UZ
 FujiFilm FinePix S200EXROlympus SP-565UZ
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR Olympus SP-565UZ
Otherwise known as FinePix S205EXR -
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-07-22 2009-01-15
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor EXR -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8 x 6mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 48.0mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Highest boosted ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 143
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 31-436mm (14.1x) 26-520mm (20.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.3 f/2.8-4.5
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 2.5 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 2.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.20 m 6.40 m (ISO 200)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 865 grams (1.91 lb) 413 grams (0.91 lb)
Physical dimensions 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 30
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 18.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.1
DXO Low light rating not tested 68
Other
Battery ID NP-140 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC Internal xD Picture Card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $500 $400