FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1438/d14385703c610eaca90a6d6ea949c25068a4050f" alt="FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/022ed/022ed39c86a4f12fb37f0ee7bf73ec9c47fc264c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-1 front Olympus Stylus SH-1 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also Known as FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus SH-2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Olympus SH-1, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and SH-1 (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and SH-1 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The S200EXR was launched 5 years before the SH-1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SH-1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the S200EXR matches up against the SH-1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Olympus Stylus SH-1. The complete galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Olympus SH-1
S200EXR | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
SH-1 | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 57 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Olympus SH-1
S200EXR | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S200EXR enjoys external measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") having a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Olympus SH-1 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Olympus SH-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the S200EXR and the SH-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3685/d368500a32887e8bdbf7b21ce86d30660fb93557" alt="FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and SH-1 is 54 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/827fc/827fc826d2c70a00f9fc9ae1d8640488cd017ff7" alt="FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The visual underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S200EXR and SH-1.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The S200EXR due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus SH-1 will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older S200EXR will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9dc9f/9dc9f26f2779cb15a4832fe895ff777d80d623e1" alt="FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/354b0/354b01d77c4122f5f24cc2fffd99df9c8059f6d8" alt="FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
Also called as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2014-03-31 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 865g (1.91 lbs) | 271g (0.60 lbs) |
Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-140 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $500 | $349 |