Clicky

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3

Portability
54
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-3 front
Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs

FujiFilm S200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
  • 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Launched February 2016
  • Earlier Model is Olympus SH-2
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Overview

Below, we will be reviewing the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and SH-3 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The S200EXR was brought out 7 years earlier than the SH-3 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the S200EXR grades vs the SH-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Olympus SH-3

 S200EXR SH-3 
Manual focus More accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the FujiFilm S200EXR

 SH-3 S200EXR 
LaunchedFebruary 2016July 2009More recent by 79 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Olympus SH-3

 S200EXR SH-3 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S200EXR provides exterior dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

Contrast the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the S200EXR against the SH-3.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S200EXR and SH-3 is 54 and 88 respectively.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The visual below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200EXR and SH-3.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The S200EXR featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus SH-3 will produce more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older S200EXR will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Portrait photography advice
Olympus SH-3 Portrait photography advice
45
focusing manually
offers face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.6")
44
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
exports RAW files
manual focus not available
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR as a Street photography camera
Olympus SH-3 as a Street photography camera
45
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/1.6")
more heavy than average (865 grams)
70
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
supports touch focus
lighter than competition in class (271 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Sports photography factors
Olympus SH-3 Sports photography factors
34
amazing zoom range (31-436mm 14.1 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
max fps very slow (2.0 frames/s)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.6")
does not have phase detect autofocus
51
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (380 shots)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Travel photography features
Olympus SH-3 Travel photography features
38
built-in flash
very long reach (436mm)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (865g)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
74
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (271 grams)
supports touch focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with FujiFilm S200EXR
Landscape photography with Olympus SH-3
34
focusing manually
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.6")
missing Timelapse mode
55
reasonably wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (380 CIPA)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Vlogging info
Olympus SH-3 Vlogging info
19
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone socket
more heavy than average (865g)
35
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
great video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (271g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm S200EXR and Olympus SH-3
 FujiFilm FinePix S200EXROlympus Stylus SH-3
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR Olympus Stylus SH-3
Also called FinePix S205EXR -
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-07-22 2016-02-08
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Chip EXR TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8 x 6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 48.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 31-436mm (14.1x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.3 f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus range 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 4.5 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 2.0fps 11.5fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.20 m 8.30 m (at ISO 3200)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 865 gr (1.91 lb) 271 gr (0.60 lb)
Dimensions 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 380 shots
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-140 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $500 $579