FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-2
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and SH-3 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S200EXR was brought out 7 years earlier than the SH-3 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the S200EXR grades vs the SH-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Olympus SH-3
S200EXR | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
SH-3 | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | July 2009 | More recent by 79 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Olympus SH-3
S200EXR | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S200EXR provides exterior dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the S200EXR against the SH-3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S200EXR and SH-3 is 54 and 88 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The visual below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200EXR and SH-3.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The S200EXR featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus SH-3 will produce more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older S200EXR will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Also called | FinePix S205EXR | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2016-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 11.5fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 865 gr (1.91 lb) | 271 gr (0.60 lb) |
Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-140 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $500 | $579 |