FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
![FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR/FujiFilm-S200EXR-front.jpg)
![Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VR-320/Olympus-VR-320-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Renewed by Olympus VR-330
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the FujiFilm S200EXR and Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the S200EXR (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly close but the S200EXR (1/1.6") and VR-320 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The S200EXR was introduced 24 months earlier than the VR-320 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the S200EXR scores vs the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Olympus VR-320
S200EXR | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
VR-320 | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 24 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Olympus VR-320
S200EXR | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm S200EXR offers outer measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm S200EXR and Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the S200EXR against the VR-320.
![FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR-vs-Olympus-VR-320-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and VR-320 is 54 and 94 respectively.
![FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR-vs-Olympus-VR-320-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The image below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the S200EXR and VR-320.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S200EXR with its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will result in extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged S200EXR will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
![FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR-vs-Olympus-VR-320-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR-vs-Olympus-VR-320-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Olympus VR-320 |
Other name | FinePix S205EXR | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 865 grams (1.91 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-140 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $500 | $179 |