Clicky

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
54
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

FujiFilm S200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
  • 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Alternate Name is FinePix S205EXR
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Renewed by Olympus VR-330
Photography Glossary

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

The following is a in-depth overview of the FujiFilm S200EXR and Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the S200EXR (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly close but the S200EXR (1/1.6") and VR-320 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The S200EXR was introduced 24 months earlier than the VR-320 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the S200EXR scores vs the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Olympus VR-320

 S200EXR VR-320 
Manually focus Very exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the FujiFilm S200EXR

 VR-320 S200EXR 
RevealedJuly 2011July 2009Newer by 24 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Olympus VR-320

 S200EXR VR-320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm S200EXR offers outer measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Contrast the FujiFilm S200EXR and Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the S200EXR against the VR-320.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and VR-320 is 54 and 94 respectively.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The image below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the S200EXR and VR-320.

Plainly, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S200EXR with its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will result in extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged S200EXR will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
45
manual focus
offers face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.6")
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Street photography information
Olympus VR-320 Street photography information
45
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/1.6")
more heavy than competition in class (865g)
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (158g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Sports photography details
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography details
34
great zoom range (31-436mm 14.1 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.6")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Travel photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography highlights
38
flash built-in
great zoom (436mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (865 grams)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
70
lighter than average (158 grams)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
34
manual focus
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.6")
lack of Timelapse function
42
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging advice
19
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
wide angle not good (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (865g)
32
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
lighter than average (158 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm S200EXR and Olympus VR-320
 FujiFilm FinePix S200EXROlympus VR-320
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model type FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR Olympus VR-320
Other name FinePix S205EXR -
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-07-22 2011-07-19
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor EXR TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8 x 6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 48.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 31-436mm (14.1x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.3 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.20 m 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 865 grams (1.91 lb) 158 grams (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-140 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC Internal SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $500 $179