FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ25W
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Alternative Name is WB5000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ25W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the S200EXR (12MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is very well matched but the S200EXR (1/1.6") and HZ25W (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S200EXR was brought out 11 months earlier than the HZ25W so they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the S200EXR matches up vs the HZ25W for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Samsung HZ25W. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung HZ25W
| S200EXR | HZ25W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| HZ25W | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 11 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung HZ25W
| S200EXR | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S200EXR provides exterior dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ25W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the S200EXR compared to the HZ25W.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and HZ25W is 54 and 70 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The pic underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S200EXR and HZ25W.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses the exact same resolution but different sensor dimensions. The S200EXR uses the larger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh simpler. The more aged S200EXR is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also called as | FinePix S205EXR | WB5000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 865 grams (1.91 pounds) | 428 grams (0.94 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-140 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $500 | $350 |