FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ35W
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally Known as FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the S200EXR (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is relatively similar but the S200EXR (1/1.6") and HZ35W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S200EXR was revealed 10 months prior to the HZ35W and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the S200EXR grades vs the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR and Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung HZ35W
| S200EXR | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| HZ35W | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 10 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung HZ35W
| S200EXR | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm S200EXR has got outer measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") along with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the S200EXR versus the HZ35W.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S200EXR and HZ35W is 54 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the S200EXR and HZ35W.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same resolution albeit different sensor dimensions. The S200EXR comes with the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow depth of field less difficult. The more aged S200EXR is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | FinePix S205EXR | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 865 grams (1.91 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-140 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $500 | $300 |
