FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung NX3000
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
89 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Announced May 2014
- Old Model is Samsung NX2000
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung NX3000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and NX3000 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S200EXR was launched 5 years earlier than the NX3000 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the S200EXR scores against the NX3000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Samsung NX3000. The complete galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung NX3000
S200EXR | NX3000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
NX3000 | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2014 | July 2009 | More modern by 58 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung NX3000
S200EXR | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S200EXR offers outside measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") along with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) and the Samsung NX3000 has sizing of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung NX3000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the S200EXR vs the NX3000.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and NX3000 is 54 and 89 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specifications. The pic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the S200EXR and NX3000.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The S200EXR because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX3000 will render extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged S200EXR will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung NX3000 |
Otherwise known as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2014-05-26 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 461k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 865 grams (1.91 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-140 | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $500 | $897 |