FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST6500
54 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
99 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Other Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST6500 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung ST6500, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and ST6500 (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and ST6500 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S200EXR was manufactured 18 months before the ST6500 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST6500 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the S200EXR matches up versus the ST6500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST6500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Samsung ST6500. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Samsung ST6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung ST6500
| S200EXR | ST6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST6500 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| ST6500 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 | July 2009 | More recent by 18 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung ST6500
| S200EXR | ST6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST6500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S200EXR has external measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) and the Samsung ST6500 has proportions of 102mm x 57mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung ST6500 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the S200EXR against the ST6500.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and ST6500 is 54 and 99 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST6500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the S200EXR and ST6500.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The S200EXR because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Samsung ST6500 will provide greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older S200EXR will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST6500 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung ST6500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung ST6500 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 865 grams (1.91 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-140 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $500 | - |