FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST93
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
97 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced April 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung ST93, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and ST93 (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and ST93 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S200EXR was launched 21 months prior to the ST93 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the S200EXR matches up against the ST93 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR and Samsung ST93. The complete galleries are provided at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery and Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung ST93
| S200EXR | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| ST93 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2011 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 21 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung ST93
| S200EXR | ST93 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S200EXR features exterior dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") having a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Samsung ST93 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung ST93 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the S200EXR compared to the ST93.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and ST93 is 54 and 97 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes just by going over specs. The picture below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200EXR and ST93.
All in all, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The S200EXR because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung ST93 will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged S200EXR is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung ST93 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung ST93 |
| Also called as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2011-04-20 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 865 grams (1.91 pounds) | 110 grams (0.24 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-140 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $500 | - |