FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST95
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally Known as FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung ST95, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and ST95 (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and ST95 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S200EXR was manufactured 18 months before the ST95 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the S200EXR matches up against the ST95 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Samsung ST95. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung ST95
| S200EXR | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| ST95 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 18 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung ST95
| S200EXR | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S200EXR enjoys outside measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung ST95 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the S200EXR compared to the ST95.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S200EXR and ST95 is 54 and 99 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The pic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S200EXR and ST95.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S200EXR due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung ST95 will deliver more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged S200EXR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung ST95 |
| Also Known as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 865g (1.91 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-140 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $500 | $145 |