FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL240
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternate Name is ST5000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL240, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S200EXR (12MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is very similar but the S200EXR (1/1.6") and TL240 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S200EXR was announced 5 months earlier than the TL240 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the S200EXR grades versus the TL240 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Samsung TL240. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung TL240
| S200EXR | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| TL240 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung TL240
| S200EXR | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 |  | January 2010 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm S200EXR offers exterior dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) and the Samsung TL240 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL240 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the S200EXR vs the TL240.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the S200EXR and TL240 is 54 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200EXR and TL240.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The S200EXR using its larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Samsung TL240 will offer extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung TL240 |
| Also Known as | FinePix S205EXR | ST5000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 865g (1.91 lb) | 160g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-140 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $500 | $171 |