FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL320
54 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Other Name is WB1000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL320, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S200EXR (12MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is relatively similar but the S200EXR (1/1.6") and TL320 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S200EXR was introduced 5 months later than the TL320 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the S200EXR matches up versus the TL320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Samsung TL320. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung TL320
| S200EXR | TL320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| TL320 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung TL320
| S200EXR | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2009 |  | February 2009 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S200EXR comes with exterior measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the S200EXR compared to the TL320.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S200EXR and TL320 is 54 and 98 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The photograph below may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the S200EXR and TL320.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The S200EXR offers the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field less difficult.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung TL320 |
| Also referred to as | FinePix S205EXR | WB1000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 865 gr (1.91 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-140 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $500 | $380 |